SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 VANCOUVER, B.C. V6Z 2N3 CANADA web site: http://www.bcuc.com IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473 and An Application by FortisBC Inc. for Approval of its 2006 Capital Expenditures Plan BEFORE: L.A. Boychuk, Commissioner L.F. Kelsey, Commissioner O R D E R WHEREAS: A. On August 16, 2005, FortisBC Inc. applied to the Commission for approval of its 2006 Capital Expenditures Plan; and B. FortisBC Inc. requests that, following a workshop and consultation with stakeholders, the application be reviewed by way of by a written process if necessary. NOW THEREFORE the Commission orders as follows: 1. The Commission requires that the FortisBC Application for approval of its 2006 Capital Expenditures Plan be reviewed by a written public process in accordance with the Regulatory Timetable attached as Appendix A. 2. FortisBC is to publish notification of the regulatory timetable in local papers by September 13, 2005 DATED at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, this 7 Attachment Order/FortibBC06CapPlan/RegulatoryReview BRITISH COL UMBIA UTILITIES COM MISSION ORDER NUMBER G -81-05 TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385 FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 September 1, 2005 th day of September 2005. BY ORDER Original signed by: L.F. Kelsey Commissioner
FortisBC Inc. for Approval of its 2006 Capital Expenditures Plan REGULATORY TIMETABLE ACTION Registration of Intervenor and Interested Parties with the Commission FortisBC Inc. Workshop with stakeholders in Kelowna, BC Commission and Intervenor Information Requests to FortisBC FortisBC Responses to Information Requests Intervenor Comments filed with the Commission and FortisBC FortisBC Response to Intervenor Comments APPENDIX A to Order No. G-81-05 Page 1 of 1 DATE Friday, September 16, 2005 Tuesday, September 20, 2005 Friday, September 30, 2005 Thursday, October 13, 2005 Thursday, October 20, 2005 Thursday, October 27, 2005
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.