LETTER NO. L‐11‐09 ERICA M. HAMILTON SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 COMMISSION SECRETARY VANCOUVER, B.C. CANADA V6Z 2N3 Commission.Secretary@bcuc.com TELEPHONE: (604) 660‐4700 web site: http://www.bcuc.com BC TOLL FREE: 1‐800‐663‐1385 FACSIMILE: (604) 660‐1102 Log No. 26663 VIA E‐MAIL March 2, 2009 BC HYDRO POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO AMEND SECTION 2.1 OF RATE SCHEDULE 3808 EXHIBIT A‐22 TO: British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership Registered Intervenors Re: British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (“BC Hydro”) Application to Amend Section 2.1 of Rate Schedule 3808 Power Purchase Agreement On January 30, 2009 BC Hydro filed its Reply Argument in the above noted proceeding. By letter dated February 5, 2009, Zellstoff Celgar sought leave to file with the Commission a brief Reply Submission stating that it wished to respond to new arguments made in BC Hydro’s January 30 th Reply Argument that the Utility had not made in its Final Argument or that were raised in any Intervenor Arguments. By letter dated February 5, 2009, BC Hydro filed its reply to Zellstoff Celgar’s request stating that the request to file a sur‐reply should only be granted where an issue was raised for the first time in reply, which BC Hydro states is not the case. By letter dated February 6, 2009, Zellstoff Celgar’s replied to BC Hydro’s February 5, 2009 letter stating that BC Hydro was seeking to preclude the Commission from considering its request for leave to file a Reply Submission and reiterated its view that new arguments were made in BC Hydro’s January 30 th Reply Argument and that the Commission Panel should grant Zellstoff Celgar leave to file its Reply submission. The Commission Panel has reviewed and considered the submissions of Zellstoff Celgar and BC Hydro, and has determined to allow these additional submissions to be added to the record of this proceeding. Yours truly, Original signed by: Erica M. Hamilton cms Attachments PF/BCH/Amend RS3808 PPA/A‐20_Amend‐Regulatory‐Timetable
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.