Orders

Decision Information

FortisBC Energy Utilities ~ Applications for Reconsideration and Variance of Order G-26-13 Common Rates, Amalgamation, and Rate Design Application Phase 2 ~ Procedural Order

Collection Orders
Date 2013-09-05
Document No. L-50-13
Order Type L-Letters
Company Name FortisBC (gas – Mainland)

Decision Content

Via Email

                                                                                                                                September 5, 2013

 

 

FEU  Common Rates, Amalgamation Rate Design Reconsideration  Phase 2                                     Exhibit A-10

 

 

To:          FortisBC Energy Inc.

                Commercial Energy Consumers of BC

Registered Interveners

                (FEU-RD-Phase2-RI)

 

Re:  Applications for Reconsideration and Variance

of Order G-26-13 dated February 25, 2013

in respect of FortisBC Energy Utilities’

Common Rates, Amalgamation and Rate Design Application

Project No. 3988717/Order G-100-13

 

Further to submission received in response to Commission letter L-46-13 (Exhibit A-7), enclosed please find further amended Regulatory Timetable attached as Appendix A.

 

Yours truly,

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                Erica Hamilton

KB/dg

Attachment

 

 

Applications for Reconsideration and Variance

of Order G-26-13 dated February 25, 2013

in respect of FortisBC Energy Utilities’

Common Rates, Amalgamation and Rate Design Application

 

 

 

AMENDED REGULATORY TIMETABLE

 

 

 

ACTION

DATE (2013)

FEU, CEC Rebuttal Evidence on Intervener Evidence – If any

Wednesday, September 25

FEU, CEC Final Submissions

Wednesday, October 9

Intervener Final Submissions

Wednesday, October 23

FEU, CEC Reply Submissions

Wednesday, November 6

 

 

                                                                                                                               

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.